4/8/2023 0 Comments Hej stylus dmg![]() I can think of several features that I would like including high res output, (scratches) in a separate layer. I must admit that I have put trough a whole bunch of my images into this app and I love the results, I own a 195 and a 600 pro polaroid cameras AND a polaroid back for my sinar.īut the sheer playfulness of this application makes it so charming and appealing. Be happy peopleĥ39 - Karl Petersson, November 26, 2008, 11:18 am : If you don't want to say thanks or make a positive suggestion, rather just keep your opinions to - keep up the great work - the fact that you can still answer some of these ridiculous posts in good spirit and humour tells me you must be a really cool person. Think about the fact that Paul has invested many hours of his own personal time and effort to give this to all of us ABSOLUTELY FREE. To all those who are impatient and have posted such rude and negative comments - get a life. iSight integration would be nice and a way to choose your crop - perhaps you could pan around the original JPEG through a realistic viewfinder? I think the randomness and lack of features adds to the charm of the app. I know in this day and age everyone wants MORE control, MORE features, MORE, MORE, MORE. ![]() Such a cool idea and beautifully, simply implemented. ![]() Note: To me, the processed images seem more Lomo than Polaroid though.ĥ47 - Warren, November 27, 2008, 10:27 pm : And they'll realize that they're fooling others as well as themselves (fooling others is worse though).Īs someone who's making a push for an instant photography community in my country, I hope you and everyone can see my concern. True, people may still remove the watermark from Photoshop or such, but that will be the extra work they'll have to go through. If you could perhaps add a watermark on the outcome, then maybe that can help our feelings a little. Either way it decreases the value of real Polaroid images and hurts the pride of real Polaroid users. Or when someone sees an actual Polaroid photo, they might think that it's created by this software. Really.īut what makes me sad is the fact that when anyone who uses this software shows off their "photos" to other people, some people (a lot of people, I think) will actually believe that they're really taken by Polaroid cameras. And when you take it to the next level by making an iPhone version, i mean, kudos to that. I will also admit that some effects are cool. Okay, I would agree that it's pretty cool to create Polaroid-like images easily without having to worry about the cost of the films. So instead of barking up negative on this tree, why not keep to the positive that this program could revitalize interest in the real film. I have 4 real polaroid cameras that I have not been able to buy picture cartridges for some time (1 of which is actually my first digital photo printer for my computer-gasp real polaroids from digital pictures how scandalous) and I have 1 camera that the cost of the film and availability makes it nearly impossible to use, I have 3 digi cameras however that I can enjoy taking pictures from any day of the week and I can run thru poladroid and get the same image I would have scanned. IN REAL TIME a real polaroid will have significant value as a result of its physical properties, but in the digital world, it has (And always has had) less value then ANY picture who's source is digital if for no other reason then the fact it is a film being scanned, etc. The reality is, the only chance instant films have a chance of surviving is increased interest on the part of the public, that said, I think it is an uphill battle as the world has shifted to digital so widely. kkudos again - will drop some $ soon - félicitations !īoth of you sound like sour grapes. ![]() Oh and feel free to use my samples for your purposes - I think that one would be good: Īnyhow. much simpler if you could provide the appropriate app with a few writing styles. As it is, the standard methods only give straight lined typed words. Lastly an app to approximate a handwritten note would be a GREAT addition to this program. dunno how to address that besides learning a bit more of photoshop Then when I do tweak there is the problem of getting the white frame back to an appropriate color. A photoshop shortcut/ recipe/ pointers that would preserve the look would be great THIRD: sometimes I find I would like to tweak the final result somewhat. Don't want to know the secret sauce, after all the competition might steal it. I am a mazed at the good taste of the algorithm logic. Second: kudos specifically for however you figure out how to crop for square.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |